Long Island Parrot Society
A bird club dedicated to responsible bird ownership through education and example

Long Island Parrot Society
P.O. Box 2754
North Babylon, NY  11703
(631) 957-1100
info@liparrotsociety.org
HOME

Adoption 

Awards
Bereavement
Bird TV
Bird of the Month
Breeders
Dangerous Stuff
Directions to Meeting 
Donations
eBay Store
Emergency Wallet card
Feather Flash - Sign up!

HELP & Emergency         Resources

Jokes & Fun
Legislation
Links
Lost & Found
Meetings
Membership
Newsletter Ads (placing)
Online Species Support
Parrot Expo
Parrot University
Pet Sitting
Placing YOUR Parrot
Schedule & Events
Search Our Site
Site Map
Shopping
Vet List

Plans for Future Shelter/Museum

Parrotdise 2004 update!
Wild Parrots of
Telegraph Hill
(book, songs and iTunes!)
CONTACT US!

 

 

LEGISLATION

National laws originate as bills in the US Congress, either in the House of Representatives (thus an "H.R." designation) or in the Senate (thus a "S." designation). A bill must be passed by both the House and Senate and then be signed by the President before it becomes law. Bill numbers restart from 1 every two years. Each two-year cycle is called a session of Congress. So a bill created in the 2009-2010 session of Congress would be designated under the 111th Congress, in 2009-2010. The titles of bills are written by the bill's sponsor and are a part of the legislation itself. Similarly state bills originate in either the Senate (thus an "S." designation) or in the Assembly (thus an "A." designation). Local bills are referred to as Resolutions (thus a resolution originating in New York City would be "NYC Resolution No.").

Before you jump on any bandwagon, read any bill carefully, as well as responses to the bill. You can track the progress of a national bill at www.govtrack.us and the progress of a state bill at http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us.

  HR669 Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act

MAY 2009 - HR669 Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act 111th Congress, 2009-2010.  The stated purpose of this Act is to establish a risk assessment process to prevent the introduction into, and establishment in, the United States of nonnative wildlife species that will cause or are likely to cause economic or environmental harm or harm to other animal species' health or human health, and for other purposes.

Will it affect our status as companion bird keepers?  Links to the text of the bill itself, as well as to the responses of other reputable sources including World Parrot Trust, are listed below.

To read the original text of the bill, click on the link: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=h111-669

For the WPT's perspective:  http://scienceblogs.com/grrlscientist/2009/05/world_parrot_trust_speaks_out.php

For additional perspectives, click on the following links:
http://www.nohr669.com/

http://nohr669.com/blog/?p=223

These are the appropriate committee members, and their stated positions as of 4/22.
  
Madeleine Z. Bordallo (Ch)(NP-Guam)
202/225-1188 - Sponsor of the Bill, For it, Staffers telling people that they are over reacting and that their pets will be safe

Neil Abercrombie (D-HI)
202/225-2726 - Co-Sponsor of the Bill, For it, One staffer told me personally that “it’s going to pass”

Henry Brown (R-SC)
202/225-3176 - Opposes the bill, most vocal opposition on the subcommittee, USARK did a great job with Rep Brown!!

Lois Capps (D-CA)
202/225-3601 - Undecided at this time

William Cassidy (R-LA)
202/225-3901 - Undecided at this time (we need to keep calling and asking for his help!!!)

Jason Chaffetz (R-UT)
202/225-7751 - Strongly opposed!!!

Donna M. Christensen (NP-Virgin Islands)
202/225-1790 - Undecided at this time

Diana L. DeGette (D-CO)
202/225-4431 - Undecided at this time

Eni F.H. Faleomavaega (NP – American Samoa)
202/225-8577 - Undecided at this time

Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
202/225-2635 - Likely to oppose

John Fleming (R-LA)
202/225-2777 - Undecided at this time

Doc Hastings (R-WA)
202/225-5816 - Undecided at this time

Dale E. Kildee (D-MI)
202/225-3611 - Co-Sponsor of the Bill, was For it but due to the volume of calls in opposition is “re-thinking” his position. GET ON HIM!! This can make a huge difference!!!

Ronald James Kind (D-WI)
202/225-5506 - Co-Sponsor, For it

Frank M. Kratovil, Jr. (D-MD)
202/225-5311 - Undecided at this time, Spoke to Legislative staffers and they are very interested in the businesses that would be hurt and why there is such strong opposition.

Douglas L. Lamborn (R-CO)
202/225-4422 - Undecided at this time

Frank J. Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ)
202/225-4671 - For it

Pedro R. Pierluisi (NP-Puerto Rico)
202/225-2615 - Undecided at this time

Nick Joe Rahall, II (D-WV)
202/225-3452 - Undecided at this time

Gregorio Sablan (I- Mariana Islands)
202/225-2646 - Co-Sponsor, For it

Carol Shea-Porter (D-NH)
202/225-5456 - Undecided at this time. Reports that staffers seem agitated by calls.

Robert J. Wittman (R-VA)
202/225-4261 - Opposed

Donald E. Young (R-AK)
202/225-5765 - Undecided at this time

 


  QUAKERS

APRIL/MAY 2009 - S.4131/A07688, introduced in April and May, 2009, are the bills to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to make (wild) psittacine birds, especially (wild) Monk (Quaker) parakeets, protected birds. Both bills have been since referred to the Senate and Assembly EnCon Committees, and the Senate bill has been further referred to the Codes Committee.  To view the text of the bill, copy one of the bill numbers shown above, paste this number in the box presented when you click here or go to http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/

Individuals wishing to comment on either or both sets of bills should write to their local State Senator and local State Assembly member, asking them to support the bills and become a co-sponsor. In addition, copies of those letters should be sent to:
1.  Hon. Linda B. Rosenthal, NY State Assembly Member, 230 West 72nd Street, 2nd Floor, Suite 2F, New York, NY 10023
2.  Hon. Joseph P. Addabbo, Jr., NY State Senator, 159-53 102nd Street, Howard Beach, NY 11414


APRIL/MAY 2009 - S.4130A/A07694A, also introduced in April and May, are the bills that relate to the sale of birds by pet dealers, and aim to amend SS401 & 402 of the Agriculture & Markets Law, amend Article 35D Article Heading, and SS751, 752, 753-a & 753-b of the General Business Law. The Senate bill has since been referred to the Senate Consumer Protection and Codes Committees, and the Assembly bill has been referred to the Agriculture & Markets Committee.  To view the text of the bill, copy one of the bill numbers shown above, paste this number in the box presented when you click here or go to http://public.leginfo.state.ny.us/

Individuals wishing to comment on either or both sets of bills should write to their local State Senator and local State Assembly member, asking them to support the bills and become a co-sponsor. In addition, copies of those letters should be sent to:
1.  Hon. Linda B. Rosenthal, NY State Assembly Member, 230 West 72nd Street, 2nd Floor, Suite 2F, New York, NY 10023
2.  Hon. Joseph P. Addabbo, Jr., NY State Senator, 159-53 102nd Street, Howard Beach, NY 11414


MARCH 2009 - Resolution 1872 - to add Quaker parrots to the list of “protected birds”.  
NYC Council Resolution No. 1872-2009, introduced March 24, 2009, co-sponsored by NYC Council Members Tony Avella and Annabel PalmaCalls for NY State to amend the Environmental Conservation Laws to make wild Quaker parrots protected, and calls upon NYC agencies to humanely relocate/remove nests if necessary.

As of JUNE 2009, the resolution was in the Environmental Protection Committee.

Persons interested in commenting on this resolution (and one does not have to be a NYC resident) may write to:
1.  Hon. Tony Avella, 38-50 Bell Blvd., Suite C, Bayside, NY 11361
2.  Hon. James F. Gennaro, Chair, Env. Prot. Committee, 185-10 Union Tpke., Fresh Meadows, NY 11366.


SEPTEMBER 2009 - The Monk parakeet bill (S4131) and the sales of birds by pet dealers (S4130) will have to be addressed next year since neither Senate house could bring the bills to the floor. S4130 and s4131 remain in the Codes committee (chaired by Sen. Eric Schneiderman).
MARCH 2010 UPDATE - NYS Bills S4131A/A7688A, to protect the colonies of wild Quaker parakeets in New York State, were reintroduced into the Senate and Assembly on Monday, March 22, and immediately recommitted to the respective Environmental Conservation Committees.  The letters received from various organizations (including 2 from Dr. Raymond, LIPS President) to the key politicians were very helpful!  The biggest opponent was PIJAC, the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council. The wording of the bill was revised to address issues raised by PIJAC.  If you would like to see the bill as it stands now, go to http://open.nysenate.gov/legislation/bill/S4131A.

The New York Invasive Species Council released a report MARCH 31, 2010, for public comment (http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/63402.html). The report does not propose a listing for Monk Parakeet.  Rather, the monk parakeet is listed (in Appendix J, line 59 on p. 114, under Assessment Priorities), as a species that should be assessed via the recommended process.  You will note that monk parakeet does not have an asterisk indicating it has not been identified as a priority for the initial assessments. Basically, the Council feels that the Quakers do not pose enough of an environmental threat to be studied right now, nor categorized.

 

Interested people may want to go to the web site (http://www.dec.ny.gov/animals/63402.html), read the report, and comment.

 

Those who comment may or may not want to suggest that the Monk (use Monk since the State does) remain as an unregulated species. It is possible that if Quakers are legally  categorized as unregulated, they may avoid documentation as invasive, or they may be reprioritized to reduce  scrutiny by NYSDEC. However, without any laws protecting wild Monks, these birds may continue being the subject of poaching and inhumane nest take-downs.

 

At present a Monk Parakeet Protection Act is being developed to afford some protection to wild-born Quakers. Just like the County and City of San Francisco afforded their wild Conures a degree of protection years ago, the state of NY can provide protection to wild Quakers here. Such protection would need to be offered by the state, as Quakers are documented in NYC’s 5 boroughs and other areas, most notably lower Westchester. Any Quakers presently living in Nassau or Suffolk Counties need to be documented immediately, to assist ongoing initiatives.


  OTHER RESOURCES

Laws & Paws -
The official newsletter of the New York State Bar Association's Committee on Animals and the Law

 

 

This page last updated:  Saturday, April 24, 2010